Search found 513 matches
- Thu Oct 26, 2017 3:59 pm
- Forum: NetBurner Software
- Topic: ROS (Robot Operating System) node on Nano?
- Replies: 0
- Views: 3794
ROS (Robot Operating System) node on Nano?
I am wondering is anyone has experience getting a Nano to run as a ROS (Robot Operating System) ( http://www.ros.org/ ) node using tcp or udp transport? ROS is a publish /subscribe protocol for sharing data across many platforms, sort of like MQTT, but with TONS of tools for modeling, simulating and...
- Mon Oct 27, 2014 11:59 am
- Forum: NetBurner Software
- Topic: Suggestions for unpacking "Zip" type file in Netburner?
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2661
Re: Suggestions for unpacking "Zip" type file in Netburner?
Have not used either, but have similar interest and found:
http://www.7-zip.org/sdk.html and
http://tukaani.org/xz/
http://www.7-zip.org/sdk.html and
http://tukaani.org/xz/
- Mon Aug 11, 2014 5:16 am
- Forum: NetBurner Hardware
- Topic: microSD support in MOD5441X and NANO54415
- Replies: 11
- Views: 15388
Re: microSD support in MOD5441X and NANO54415
My 1st guess was that the format string you're using may include a format specifier parameter that may be inappropriate for the type you're trying to format. However f_getfreespace() just returns and int. Looking at C:\nburn\docs\EFFS\fat_331.pdf the FAT Implementation guide, section 4.18 on page 49...
- Fri Jun 13, 2014 6:34 pm
- Forum: NetBurner Software
- Topic: RTC related errors on NANO54415 DevKit
- Replies: 5
- Views: 5449
- Thu Jun 12, 2014 9:46 pm
- Forum: NetBurner Software
- Topic: RTC related errors on NANO54415 DevKit
- Replies: 5
- Views: 5449
Re: RTC related errors on NANO54415 DevKit
Hi Guys: I tried the C:\nburn\examples\NANO54415\OnChipRtc\main.cpp demo.
I found no connection to the 207.200.81.113 NTP server.
I changed it to: 198.123.30.132, or to "164.67.62.194" and both worked.
I found no connection to the 207.200.81.113 NTP server.
I changed it to: 198.123.30.132, or to "164.67.62.194" and both worked.
- Wed Jun 11, 2014 7:16 am
- Forum: Off-Topic
- Topic: MOD54415 Pin IRQ state at initialization
- Replies: 7
- Views: 10590
Re: MOD54415 Pin IRQ state at initialization
You can poll the pin before setting to IRQ mode. Once in IRQ mode, you need to reconfigure to GPIO to poll it.
- Wed Jun 11, 2014 5:36 am
- Forum: Off-Topic
- Topic: MOD54415 Pin IRQ state at initialization
- Replies: 7
- Views: 10590
Re: MOD54415 Pin IRQ state at initialization
I don't think you need to check the levels or do anything before arming the IRQ. Just call SetPinIrq(); the logic works in either of the two cases: Case 1) Say level is lo when you arm IRQ to act on a falling edge. Nothing happens when you execute SetPinIrq() because even though the level is low, th...
- Tue Jun 10, 2014 1:22 pm
- Forum: Off-Topic
- Topic: MOD54415 Pin IRQ state at initialization
- Replies: 7
- Views: 10590
Re: MOD54415 Pin IRQ state at initialization
Forgot to add: Once you arm the IRQ to act on a particular edge, there is no need to poll the line: you WILL miss the edge that caused the IRQ!
- Tue Jun 10, 2014 1:21 pm
- Forum: Off-Topic
- Topic: MOD54415 Pin IRQ state at initialization
- Replies: 7
- Views: 10590
Re: MOD54415 Pin IRQ state at initialization
The default pin functions should be GPIO and so level could be determined before configuring the IRQ. However there may be no need to do that. When you call SetPinIrq() you spec the IRQ polarity to be rising, falling or both edges. So if you spec'd falling edge, and the line was already low, no IRQ ...
- Mon Jun 09, 2014 8:10 am
- Forum: Off-Topic
- Topic: MOD54415 HiRes Timer vs Watchdog
- Replies: 23
- Views: 23781
Re: MOD54415 HiRes Timer vs Watchdog
Nope, one task per prio! After an IRQ occurs, or when the task switcher runs, the task with the highest priority that's ready to run will run. Read that statement again! When a task is blocked, (ie waiting for a resource, something like a semaphore) it is not ready to run. It becomes ready to run wh...