NetBurner Community Forum

Hi,

We would prefer not to move over to NNDK v3 after all because we would like to ensure that bug fixes and patches for one platform can be ported to our legacy platforms (like e.g. MOD5282) which don’t support NNDK v3.

We are trying to automate our builds in CI, and Docker would be preferable to ...

Hi. Thanks for the quick response.

NNDK v2.9.7 only has Windows and Mac releases, and I confirmed that their m68k-elf-gnu cross-build toolchains will NOT run on Linux (“Exec format error”). As a result, Linux Docker is not possible without more support.

If there is release of NNDK v2.X.X for Linux ...

Hi,

We have recently ported our application from NNDK 2.7.3 to NNDK 2.9.7.

Currently all of our development is done on Windows with NBEclipse. However we are looking to start building using the CLI, in particular within a Docker container.

I noticed this repo which seems to support building NNDK ...

This can be closed. Discovered later that a factory application (with AutoUpdate built-in) is indeed running on the products out-of-the-box.

Hello,

I’m wondering what is the factory state of the MODXXXX line of products.

Is there an HTTP server that is part of the of the pre-flashed .s19 application? Can I detect the board IP address using IPSetup when it is in its factory state and reprogram it using AutoUpdate (once I am on the same ...

Hi Tom,

Maybe the fact that there would be much change to the codebase suggested that it would be a great deal of logic change. I did not mean that.

Rather, I just meant that there would be a great deal of change in terms of lines of code. This based on the fact that, for example:
- all basic ...

Hi TomNB,

I just realized I should probably have responded last week to let you know that I found the above information very useful! Thank you!

I was waiting to see whether my team would decide go with MOD54415 or MODM7AE70 given the above information. However, they have not yet made a decision ...

Hello,

I am looking to migrate from the MOD5282 to a newer platform that is pin-compatible with it.

On the MOD5282, other than power and ground, I am currently using the following pins on J1:
- 6: Chip Select 2
- 7: Chip Select 3
- 8: Output Enable
- 11: Transfer-in-progress

And the following ...

Hello TomNB,

Apologies for the late reply. I was waiting to hear from my team today about whether NNDK 2.9.7 is suitable for our needs at the moment.

Since it supports GCC-8, I received confirmation it should be suitable. Thanks very much for providing us that information.

I will plan to update ...

Hello TomNB,

Thanks for very quick reply.

I would be looking to update to C++17 to be able to reuse code from an external codebase with the MOD5282. I believe that requires GCC-7 or GCC-8 for full support, according to this: https://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cxx-status.html#cxx17

If that is not ...